cinap_len...@gmx.de wrote on Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:37:09AM MST: > you can do without a "other" fs. we added support for +t flags like > there is in fossil, so you can just mark directories and files > as temporary in the "main" filesystem so they dont get dumped > to worm. (this works recursively on directories) > > but requires a bigger fscache partition if you have lots of stuff > flagged temporary. and you loose all your +t flagged data when > recovering the filesystem from the last archival snapshot (dump). Considering what you wrote, I don't see any substantial benefit of supporting +t flags in the "main" filesystem when you have "other" at your disposal. Has that discussion already taken place on IRC or another mailing list?
Why is +t preferable to having an "other" filesystem? Is it merely so that you don't have to be concerned with guessing an appropriate size for the "other" fileystem? -- David Romano .:. un...@cpan.org
