On Fri Sep 16 10:41:24 EDT 2011, rminn...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:46 PM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> > wrote: > > > p.s. i guess the claim i thought i saw that you need 1gb pages > > isn't correct. that's good, but i need to track down why i don't see 'em > > on the atom. > > My code that mapped physical memory with 1 GiB pages in the kernel got > lost in the shuffle. I expect to bring it back.
please don't make it required. there's already array of page sizes per mach. - erik
