erik quanstrom <quans...@labs.coraid.com> writes:

>> I was able to find the former, but not the latter.  Russ' "cryptfs"
>> appears to be a modification of kfs.  But isn't kfs one of the file
>> systems that's now considered deprecated?
>
> why would it be considered depricated?  because it's
> easy to use, easy to understand, and just works?

I thought I read somewhere that kfs was deprecated.  In one of the man
pages?  On the wiki?  I don't recall.  It was about the old kfs file
system being replaced by fossil...or something like that.

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
|E-Mail: smi...@zenzebra.mv.com             PGP key ID: BC549F8B|
|Fingerprint: 9329 DB4A 30F5 6EDA D2BA  3489 DAB7 555A BC54 9F8B|
+---------------------------------------------------------------+

Reply via email to