* Charles Forsyth <fors...@terzarima.net> wrote:

> ``My last company switched to nmake, and they're OUT OF BUISINESS :-) :-) 
> :-)''
> [fortune]

When it comes to builder systems, I'm still thinking of an more
declarative approach: describing the software's structure by
certain object types and their relations (eg. we have some 
executable, made of some list of sources and importing some
libraries) and then let the buildsystem handle it all
(won't be as flexible as make+friends, but on an much higher
abstraction level).

Some time ago I'd started a little reference implementation:

    git://pubgit.metux.de/projects/treebuild.git

Maybe somebody finds it a bit interesting ;-)


cu
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/

 phone:  +49 36207 519931  email: weig...@metux.de
 mobile: +49 151 27565287  icq:   210169427         skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to