On 29 October 2010 17:17, Bruce Ellis <bruce.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > gee i thought i was the first to say deadly-embrace on this thread. > it's not only problematic it's wrong. just reiterating what little > shaun said circa 1999.
if deadlock is the issue, isn't it solved just as well by asynchronously receiving the Rclunk as by processing the whole clunk message asychronously?
