On 29 October 2010 17:01, Charles Forsyth <fors...@terzarima.net> wrote: >>Do you do completely asynch clunks or just the wait for the response?. > > it uses `completely' async clunks, which is why it can be broken. > > having the original process send the Tclunk and not wait > for the Rclunk is different.
for some reason, though i didn't look at the diffs, i thought that's what this patch did. even sending Tclunk synchronously is still problematic in quite a few scenarios, for the reasons i outlined above.
