On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:29:49PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > I can't get a Soekris net4801 box to boot Plan 9 via PXE.
> > 
> > On my Plan 9 fileserver (which also runs ip/dhcpd and ip/tftpd), I
> > created /cfg/pxe/<MAC of the first interface on the net4801>, which is
> > almost identical to the file I use for a diskless terminal. The only
> > differences are that I put mouseport, monitor and vgasize in
> > comment. The remaining things, bootfile and nobootprompt are the same
> > as for the terminal. I first tried to boot /386/9pc.gz and then
> > /386/9pccpu.gz (see below). I also added *nomp=1 but that doesn't seem
> > to get it any further. The console output looks as follows:
> 
> the output stops after the jump to the kernel proper.  so
> either the jump the kernel, or the very early boot process before
> the "Plan 9" print hung, or the serial console isn't working in the
> kernel proper.
> 
> have you set up the serial console in your pxe'd plan9.ini?

For the record... although 9600 baud, 8 bits and 1 stopbit is the
default for serial lines, the default console is cga... Adding
console=0 to the pxe'd plan9.ini solved the issue.

> that would cover the second case.  if you're using the distribution
> 9load, serial baud setting is via baud=.  the kernel baud setting
> is , e.g. "console=0 b19200".  i changed 9load in 9atom to recognize
> kernel-style console configuration when i was booting soekris
> boxen.
> 
> i haven't used a soekris for quite some time.  (too slow!)  iirc,

Good enough to play around and learn something new. I would like to
turn it into an auth-only server booting from a fileserver, as
indicated on [*]. More specifically, I wonder if this would be safe:
on the one hand, an auth server actually shouldn't provide other
services, on the other hand it would get everything via the
network. Another thing to check would be the usage of a piece of a CF
card as NVRAM.

[*] 
http://www.plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/Configuring_a_standalone_CPU_server/index.html

> some versions of bios are more friendly than others.  iirc 1.33
> was a problem with plan 9 on my particular hardware.
> 
> as a wild guess, one might disable the functions in cga.c
> obviously, there's no cga.

Thanks for mentioning this as it caught my eye when re-reading the
console part of the plan9.ini manpage.

> - erik

-- 
Frank Lenaerts ---------------------------------------- fr...@inua.be


Reply via email to