> But then I start to wonder why we feel we want to compete with HTTP when it > already works, and is still fairly simple. Nothing wrong with improving 9P > I suppose, but what's so wrong with HTTP transfers that it warrants changing > our beloved resource sharing protocol? Maybe I'm being too practical, and > not feeling adventurous or something :-)
do we put a http bag on the side of every /n/remoteslowlink fileserver, since 9p can't take care of it's own business? - erik
