yes and no. Yes in that you can use inferno + op to bridge plan 9 systems. No in that there's no native implementation yet.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com> wrote: >>> We did a simple experiment recently: added a new 9p type called >>> Tstream, because this issue of streams vs. transactions has been >>> bugging me for years. The semantics are simple: it's a lot like Tread >>> (almost same packet) but a single Tstream results in any number of >>> Rstreams, until you hit no more data (/dev/mouse) or maybe EOF >>> (/usr/rminnich/movie). Andrey tossed a sample implementation into >>> newsham's 9p library. We saw a 27x improvement in performance from >>> calgary to sandia for a big file. Fcp did not come close. >> >> That's similar to a Tget in op with unlimited replies. The difference adds on >> quickly. > > i was going to ask if anyone has tried this with op. is there an > implementation of oxport/ofs for plan 9? > > >
