On Tue Apr 27 00:31:03 EDT 2010, news...@lava.net wrote: > What about some mounting/binding hackery where you replace > /dev/cons so that the original "cpu" command works?
why the resistance to il? rx is a good example of il's strengths. in order for cpu to work, it uses 2 extra processes. rx is much more efficient. (and 1/4 the code) great for your trusted network. or perhaps your local supercomputer. rx doesn't do encryption. a srx using ssl/tls would be able to sneak a 0 write through since the record layer should expand that into a application record with application data length of 0. - erik
