For the record: rx(1) man pages imply
the sort of behaviour from rx(1) that I
would like:
"...
eqn paper | rx kremvax troff -ms | rx deepthought lp
Parallel processing: do each stage of a pipeline on a
different machine.
"
however, it seems not to work this way.
My basic test has been something like:
echo '1 2 3' | rx $cpu awk -f $home/comp.awk | gview
... just a simple sample use case.
Is there something special about awk(1)
that would cause it not to receive
standard input the way rx(1) provides it?
Even just:
rx $cpu awk -f $home/comp.awk
wants to take standard input, but
apparently doesn't get it.
Thanks,
ak
On 4/26/10, Eric Van Hensbergen <eri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The version there is Plan9ports and should work under Plan 9 as well -- if
> it doesn't, beat on Noah :)
>
> -eric
>
> On Apr 26, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Akshat Kumar wrote:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> The only reference to PUSH I see is
>> at http://code.google.com/p/push
>> where the site reads,
>>
>> "This is the new unix port of push."
>>
>> Where might I find the native Plan 9
>> version?
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> ak
>>
>>
>> On 4/25/10, Eric Van Hensbergen <eri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Take a look at Noah's PUSH shell. It's not there yet, but maybe later
>>> today.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Apr 26, 2010, at 2:50 AM, Akshat Kumar
>>> <aku...@mail.nanosouffle.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Steve,
>>>>
>>>> rx $cpu 'procdata' | process
>>>>
>>>> works well for one way.
>>>> However,
>>>>
>>>> procdata | rx $cpu 'process'
>>>>
>>>> is in the same way as with cpu(1).
>>>> Any suggestions for piping in that
>>>> direction?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> ak
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Steve Simon <st...@quintile.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> cpu -c 'procdata' | process
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Perhaps I'm overlooking some simple solutions here.
>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>>
>>>>> cpu(1) works by starting exportfs on the remote machine and serving
>>>>> the local machines filespace. The remote shell is started with its
>>>>> stdin/out/err attached to /mnt/term/dev/cons, thus the command you
>>>>> tried will not work (by design).
>>>>>
>>>>> what you want is rx(1) which does exactly what you want, somthing
>>>>> like rsh(1) from the Unix world, except it uses plan9' secure
>>>>> authentication; e.g.:
>>>>>
>>>>> rx $cpu | process
>>>>>
>>>>> -Steve
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
