>From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [mailto:9fans-boun...@9fans.net] On Behalf Of >Karljurgen Feuerherm >Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 2:15 PM >To: 'Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs' >Subject: Re: [9fans] TeX: hurrah!
>Ok--so it's agreed that it's not OO that's the problem, it's the users, then, >who don't know which tool to use when. Not at all the same thing. No, we don't agree. I said there were places objects were useful, I never said object orientation was useful; not at all, the same thing. You can write imperative-style code in a functional language, and you can write functional-style code in an imperative language. That does not mean you code is auto-magically imperative or functional. >K
