As far as i understand, cifs(4) is a cifs client, which makes remote
Windows shares
available to a Plan9 machine, while aquarela(8) is a cifs server, which
makes (lokal)
Plan9 filesystems available as Windows shares to remote clients.
So cifs(4) is the complent of aquarela(8), not a replacement.
Did i miss something?
Regards,
Jorge-León
erik quanstrom wrote:
erik quanstrom wrote:
perhaps the new cifs server would be better?
A pointer please.
Already searched mailing list, (8) man pages, and the contrib packages
but only found mention to aquarela as a cifs server.
it's in the distribution.
cifs(4), /sys/src/cmd/cifs, /$objtype/bin/aux/cifs, /$objtype/bin/cifscmd
- erik
