> > There's no 9p implementation. Â I thought about writing one > > a couple times, and I'd love to do that (I want to write acme > > extensions in Go), but it hasn't been a priority. Â Another thorny > > issue is what to name the package, since you can't start a > > package name with a digit.
shouldn't you be writing a plan9 server to talk to go-pee. ken has 20 years to distill and improve 9p, imagine what it will look like.
