or "tissah-go" for that matter :)
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Eris Discordia
<eris.discor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> arabic numeral 9 is very close: ۹
>
> Puny pedantry: that's a(n) Hindi/Indic numeral. 9 is already an "Arabic
> numeral."
>
> If playing on numerals is allowed why shouldn't they call it IXgo or even
> Kyuugo?
>
>
> --On Tuesday, November 10, 2009 22:47 -0800 Skip Tavakkolian
> <9...@9netics.com> wrote:
>
>>> Another thorny
>>> issue is what to name the package, since you can't start a
>>> package name with a digit.
>>
>> arabic numeral 9 is very close: ۹
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
