you mean outside of the dump when acme is dies for reasons other than
being killed/exited?

with win state, how are you going to handle the state of the shell? I
can see why they're dynamic, it could be potentially misleading to see
a changed namespace/rfork etc... and expect the shell to have the same
environment as the history.

I definitely like your restored from ideas.

I wouldn't worry about getting the patch accepted or not. Just go for it.




On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:42 PM, roger peppe<rogpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the Include path.
> contents of win buffers.
> Undo/Redo history.
>
> ok, the last might be pushing it a bit,
> but ideally i'd like to be able to dump
> an acme session and restore it without
> any loss of continuity, and the Undo/Redo history
> is a very useful part of my acme context.
>
> while i'm about it, there are a few other dump
> features i'd like to see:
> - automatic dumping every 30s or so in case of a crash.
> - Dump would dump to the restored-from file rather than
> $home/acme.dump by default.
> - atomic dump file creation - if, for some reason,
> acme dies half-way through dumping, i don't
> want the old dump file to be erased with a dud
> new one.
>
> most of this should be fairly straightforward,
> i've just not made space in my life to do it yet.
>
> and i doubt it would be accepted as a patch anyway.
>
>
> 2009/8/7 Noah Evans <noah.ev...@gmail.com>:
>> What other stuff are you thinking of?
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:02 PM, roger peppe<rogpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2009/8/7 Noah Evans <noah.ev...@gmail.com>:
>>>> The dump doesn't preserve indent state
>>>
>>> personally, i think it should.
>>>
>>> and some other stuff as well.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to