Congratulations! I'm interested in giving it a shot; is it just a tarball to compile, or is it a package for fgb's contrib(1)? I'll throw it on sources for you if you don't have an alternate hosting solution while you wait for your contrib.
John On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM, <driv...@0xabadba.be> wrote: > I currently have hg and this bookmarks git module working on plan9. > Russ, thanks for the clue -- i have this packaged up now (my first package > but doesn't seem like rocket science. Please let me know if you are > interested. Also to be honest 98% of this was Filipe and FGB i just put a > few pieces together to get 1.3 and git working nicely together. > > hope everyone is doing well, > > respectfully, > > james toy > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Federico G. Benavento" <benave...@gmail.com> > To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> > Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:25:06 -0300 > Subject: Re: [9fans] git on plan9 > ok, I didn't get this the first time, so this is not the hg which is in > sources > this is hg 1.3 > > cpu% hg clone --traceback http://bitbucket.org/jespern/django-piston/ > destination directory: django-piston > requesting all changes > adding changesets > adding manifests > adding file changes > added 161 changesets with 309 changes to 67 files > updating working directory > 53 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved > cpu% > > the one i have installed just works, notice is the same link you provided. > as I told you yesterday, hg changes a lot of stuff from release to > release, and it's probably ape's fault. > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Federico G. > Benavento<benave...@gmail.com> wrote: >> and my reply to that was: >> >> my patch behaves exactly like chmod(1), so those bits are inherited >> I think this is the right thing to do as posix doesn't support those bits. >> >> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/sys/stat.h.html >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Federico G. >> Benavento<benave...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> it was loosing the dir bit, from the readme: >>> >>> Fixed chmod and fchmod, they were ignoring the dir bit. >>> >>> federico >>> >>> >>> from the notes: >>> >>> Fri May 30 00:04:19 EDT 2008 geoff >>> should append-only and exclusive-access be cleared, >>> inherited or settable via the mode argument? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 6:17 PM, ron minnich<rminn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I may be missing it, but what particular thing in the chmod failed? >>>> What was it trying to set? >>>> >>>> ron >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Federico G. Benavento >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Federico G. Benavento >> > > > > -- > Federico G. Benavento > > -- "I've tried programming Ruby on Rails, following TechCrunch in my RSS reader, and drinking absinthe. It doesn't work. I'm going back to C, Hunter S. Thompson, and cheap whiskey." -- Ted Dziuba
