> The point is how to compute the offset(s) of the last field at compile / > run time.
the offset of the last field is not in question. i believe you mean the size? > 8c should reject not defined (named only) types, as *nix compilers do. yes. > > I prefer to have only the tricky but standard "char x[0]" tails. i'd prefer not to have them, either. but it's too late for that. > Your patch will be included in the next distribution CD ? no. i haven't submitted it yet. - erik
