> The point is how to compute the offset(s) of the last field at compile / 
> run time.

the offset of the last field is not in question.  i believe you mean the size?

> 8c should reject not defined (named only) types, as *nix compilers do.

yes.

> 
> I prefer to have only the tricky but standard  "char  x[0]" tails.

i'd prefer not to have them, either.  but it's too late for that.

> Your patch will be included in the next distribution CD ?

no.  i haven't submitted it yet.

- erik

Reply via email to