On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Fernan Bolando<fernanbola...@mailc.net> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Mathieu L.<lejat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> if you can't get an old one from swtch.com, I can tar this mid-february >> tree I have - or rather only the necessary parts - and serve it to you >> if you want. >> >> Mathieu >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Adrian Tritschler <a...@ajft.org> >> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> >> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:33:22 +1000 >> Subject: Re: [9fans] p9p vac issue >> 2009/6/22 Mathieu L. <lejat...@gmail.com> >>> >>> Indeed, this works for me as well. >> >> >>> >>> I've just migrated the arenas, bloom and isect to another machine with >>> a p9p tree from mid February and I had no problem unvacing my data >>> there. And for what it's worth, checkindex on that machine didn't report >>> any problem while it did on the machine with the recent p9p install >>> (which gives me the same vac/unvac issues as the ones already reported >>> by a few people). >> >> OK, so all I need now is to get my hands on an old copy of the p9p >> binaries... the only old ones I've got are carefully backed up inside the >> venti that I can't get at :) >> >>> >>> So the data seems to be ok, which is already quite a relief. >>> > > Did you guys get this message when building the june 22 p9p? > vac.c:509: warning: sizeof(pointer) possibly incorrect in argument 3 >
looks like it's related to the error above. you might want to downgrade to http://swtch.com/plan9port/plan9port-20090609.tgz fernan -- http://www.fernski.com
