On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Mathieu L.<lejat...@gmail.com> wrote: > if you can't get an old one from swtch.com, I can tar this mid-february > tree I have - or rather only the necessary parts - and serve it to you > if you want. > > Mathieu > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Adrian Tritschler <a...@ajft.org> > To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:33:22 +1000 > Subject: Re: [9fans] p9p vac issue > 2009/6/22 Mathieu L. <lejat...@gmail.com> >> >> Indeed, this works for me as well. > > >> >> I've just migrated the arenas, bloom and isect to another machine with >> a p9p tree from mid February and I had no problem unvacing my data >> there. And for what it's worth, checkindex on that machine didn't report >> any problem while it did on the machine with the recent p9p install >> (which gives me the same vac/unvac issues as the ones already reported >> by a few people). > > OK, so all I need now is to get my hands on an old copy of the p9p > binaries... the only old ones I've got are carefully backed up inside the > venti that I can't get at :) > >> >> So the data seems to be ok, which is already quite a relief. >>
Did you guys get this message when building the june 22 p9p? vac.c:509: warning: sizeof(pointer) possibly incorrect in argument 3 regards fernan -- http://www.fernski.com
