> Assuming SHA-1 is indeed cryptographically secure (which is the assumption > made by the venti paper)
Well, I read it like it was just sufficiently secure against unintended collisions. It's not intended to encrypt, but to efficiently store data.
> Assuming SHA-1 is indeed cryptographically secure (which is the assumption > made by the venti paper)
Well, I read it like it was just sufficiently secure against unintended collisions. It's not intended to encrypt, but to efficiently store data.