On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 2:57 PM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote: >> And finally, I'd say having these exceptions is a mistake. Unless, >> there's a really good reason, they break the paradigm of RFNOMNT >> quite needlessly without even a hint of a benefit. > > so, it's likely that RFNOMNT was added and to avoid > breaking too many things, a few exceptions were added > with the intention of fixing and removing them.
i don't see why that's likely. maybe those were simply judged to be the safe set of devices. russ
