Dear Francesca Palombini, 

Thanks for your comments.
Please see responses inline bellows.

Cheers,
Younghwan Choi

-----------------------------------------------
YOUNGHWAN CHOI, Ph.D.
Principal Researcher, PEC, ETRI
Tel +82-42-860-1429   Fax +82-42-860-5404 
Email  y...@etri.re.kr <mailto:y...@etri.re.kr>

> On Dec 14, 2022, at 6:07 AM, Francesca Palombini via Datatracker 
> <nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-19: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to 
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-nfc/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I share other ADs' concern about availability of the NFC spec, however it is 
> my
> understanding that Erik has had access to it, and I trust he was able to do a
> full review of the draft.

I believe the NFC spec is given to all reviewers by email I sent. If you don't 
have the NFC spec so far. please inform me.

> 
> Given that, I would ballot No Objection. However I have identified what I 
> think
> is a simple typo, but important enough to warrant a blocking comment. Section
> 4.8:
> 
>> Length:
>> 
>> This is the length of this option (including the type and length fields) in
> units of 8 octets. The value of this field is 1 for 6-bit NFC node addresses.
> 
> I believe you meant "in octets" or "in units of 8 bits", right?
> 


You're right. It’s a typo, so "in units of 8 bits” is correct. I will revise 
this in the next version of the draft.
Thanks for your correction.

_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

Reply via email to