Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-19: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-nfc/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I share other ADs' concern about availability of the NFC spec, however it is my understanding that Erik has had access to it, and I trust he was able to do a full review of the draft. Given that, I would ballot No Objection. However I have identified what I think is a simple typo, but important enough to warrant a blocking comment. Section 4.8: > Length: > > This is the length of this option (including the type and length fields) in units of 8 octets. The value of this field is 1 for 6-bit NFC node addresses. I believe you meant "in octets" or "in units of 8 bits", right? _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
