Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-14: No Record

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# GEN AD review of draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases-14

CC @larseggert

Thanks to Peter E. Yee for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/6HVrWkU6KnjgzrFF5ITZGBqsDBA).

## Comments

### Section 9, paragraph 8
```
     [IEEE802154]
                IEEE standard for Information Technology, "IEEE Standard
                for Low-Rate Wireless Networks".
```
No URL or other metadata?

### Inclusive language

Found terminology that should be reviewed for inclusivity; see
https://www.rfc-editor.org/part2/#inclusive_language for background and more
guidance:

 * Term `master`; alternatives might be `active`, `central`, `initiator`,
   `leader`, `main`, `orchestrator`, `parent`, `primary`, `server`
 * Term `slave`; alternatives might be `follower`, `peripheral`, `replica`,
   `responder`, `secondary`, `standby`, `worker`
 * Term `traditional`; alternatives might be `classic`, `classical`, `common`,
   `conventional`, `customary`, `fixed`, `habitual`, `historic`,
   `long-established`, `popular`, `prescribed`, `regular`, `rooted`,
   `time-honored`, `universal`, `widely used`, `widespread`
 * Term `native`; alternatives might be `built-in`, `fundamental`, `ingrained`,
   `intrinsic`, `original`
 * Term `blinds`; alternatives might be `visually impaired`, `unmindful of`,
   `unconcerned about`, `negligent of`, `unaware`, `uncomprehending`,
   `unaware`, `uncritical`, `unthinking`, `hasty`, `blocked`, `opaque`

## Nits

All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there
will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
did with these suggestions.

### Outdated references

Document references `draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-18`, but `-19` is the latest available
revision.

### URLs

These URLs in the document did not return content:

 * https://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/1901.2-2013.html
 * http://www.g3-plc.com/home/
 * http://groups.homeplug.org/tech/Netricity

These URLs in the document can probably be converted to HTTPS:

 * 
http://www.techstreet.com/ashrae/standards/ashrae-135-2016?product_id=1918140#jumps
 * http://www.wi-sun.org

### Grammar/style

#### Section 5.2, paragraph 3
```
w-cost, multi-drop field bus to inter connect the most numerous elements (sen
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
This word is normally spelled as one.

#### Section 5.3, paragraph 1
```
infrastructure, and thus it falls outside of the constrained node network sco
                                  ^^^^^^^^^^
```
This phrase is redundant. Consider using "outside".

#### Section 5.6, paragraph 2
```
ove. Note that NFC is often considered to offer intrinsic security propertie
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
The verb "considered" is used with the gerund form.

#### Section 7, paragraph 2
```
ommunication Union, "Short range narrow-band digital radiocommunication trans
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^
```
This word is normally spelled as one.

## Notes

This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the
[`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into
individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT].

[ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
[ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments
[IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool



_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

Reply via email to