> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov
> 
> Well, it seems just like a peculiar effect of required vs. optional
> dependencies. The loop is in the default installation. Details:
> 
> # svcprop filesystem/usr | grep scheduler
> svc:/system/filesystem/usr:default/:properties/scheduler_usr/entities
> fmri svc:/system/scheduler
> svc:/system/filesystem/usr:default/:properties/scheduler_usr/external
> boolean true
> svc:/system/filesystem/usr:default/:properties/scheduler_usr/grouping
> astring optional_all
> svc:/system/filesystem/usr:default/:properties/scheduler_usr/restart_on
> astring none
> svc:/system/filesystem/usr:default/:properties/scheduler_usr/type
> astring service
> 
> # svcprop scheduler | grep minimal
> svc:/application/cups/scheduler:default/:properties/filesystem_minimal/ent
> ities
> fmri svc:/system/filesystem/minimal
> svc:/application/cups/scheduler:default/:properties/filesystem_minimal/gro
> uping
> astring require_all
> svc:/application/cups/scheduler:default/:properties/filesystem_minimal/res
> tart_on
> astring none
> svc:/application/cups/scheduler:default/:properties/filesystem_minimal/typ
> e
> astring service
> 
> # svcprop filesystem/minimal | grep usr
> usr/entities fmri svc:/system/filesystem/usr
> usr/grouping astring require_all
> usr/restart_on astring none
> usr/type astring service
> 

I must be missing something - I don't see anything above that indicates any 
required vs optional dependencies.

I'm not quite sure what I'm supposed to be seeing in the svcprop outputs you 
pasted...


> > The answer to this question, will in all likelihood, shed some light on my
> situation, trying to understand why my iscsi mounted zpool import/export
> service is failing to go down or come up in the order I expected, when it's
> dependent on the iscsi initiator.
> 
> Likewise - see what dependency type you introduced, and verify
> that you've "svcadm refreshed" the service after config changes.

Thank you for the suggestion - I like the direction this is heading, but I 
don't know how to do that yet.  (This email is the first I ever heard of it.)

Rest assured, I'll be googling and reading more man pages in the meantime.
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
              • ... Dan Swartzendruber
              • ... Richard Elling
              • ... Dan Swartzendruber
              • ... Richard Elling
              • ... Dan Swartzendruber
              • ... Jim Klimov
              • ... Dan Swartzendruber
              • ... Jim Klimov
              • ... Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
              • ... Jim Klimov
              • ... Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
              • ... Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
              • ... Jim Klimov
              • ... Jim Klimov
              • ... Jim Klimov
              • ... Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
              • ... Timothy Coalson
              • ... Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
              • ... Timothy Coalson
  • Re: [zfs-discuss]... matthew patton

Reply via email to