On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Ian Collins <i...@ianshome.com> wrote:
> On 09/13/12 10:23 AM, Timothy Coalson wrote: > >> Unless i'm missing something, they didn't solve the "matching snapshots" >> thing yet, from their site: >> >> "To Do: >> >> Additional error handling for mismatched snapshots (last destination snap >> no longer exists on the source) walk backwards through the remote snaps >> until a common snapshot is found and destroy non-matching remote snapshots" >> >> > That's what I do as party of my "destroy snapshots not on the source" > check. Over many years of managing various distributed systems, I've > discovered the apparently simple tends to get complex! I tricked the auto-snapshot service into doing that bit for me on the receiving end, so I can just use zfs send -I, however due to when it decides to do the cleanup for each category (it won't clean up any old daily snapshots unless the auto-snapshot property is true when it is time to take a daily snap), adding it to cron requires more care than I'd like. Since I am only replicating between two hosts, though, I can deal with it. I have been tempted to write a cron script to replace the auto-snap service, to remove its naming classes, cleanup oddities, etc, but haven't had a good reason to yet. Tim
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss