Missing an important ‘NOT’: >OK. I see. And I agree such quotas will **NOT** scale well. From users' side, >they always > ask for more space or even no quotas at all. One of the main purposes behind > such quotas > is that we can account usage and get the statistics. Is it possible to do it > without setting > such quotas? > >Thanks. > >Fred >
_____________________________________________ From: Fred Liu Sent: 星期三, 四月 25, 2012 20:05 To: develo...@lists.illumos.org Cc: 'zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org' Subject: RE: [developer] Setting default user/group quotas[usage accounting]? On Apr 24, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Fred Liu wrote: Yes. Thanks. I am not aware of anyone looking into this. I don't think it is very hard, per se. But such quotas don't fit well with the notion of many file systems. There might be some restricted use cases where it makes good sense, but I'm not convinced it will scale well -- user quotas never scale well. -- richard >OK. I see. And I agree such quotas will scale well. From users' side, they >always > ask for more space or even no quotas at all. One of the main purposes behind > such quotas > is that we can account usage and get the statistics. Is it possible to do it > without setting > such quotas? > >Thanks. > >Fred >
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
