2011/11/11 Ian Collins <i...@ianshome.com> > On 11/11/11 08:52 PM, darkblue wrote: > >> >> >> 2011/11/11 Ian Collins <i...@ianshome.com <mailto:i...@ianshome.com>> >> >> >> On 11/11/11 02:42 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> >> From: >> zfs-discuss-bounces@**opensolaris.org<zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org> >> >> <mailto:zfs-discuss-bounces@**opensolaris.org<zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org> >> > >> [mailto:zfs-discuss- <mailto:zfs-discuss-> >> boun...@opensolaris.org >> <mailto:bounces@opensolaris.**org<boun...@opensolaris.org> >> >] >> >> On Behalf Of darkblue >> >> 1 * XEON 5606 >> 1 * supermirco X8DT3-LN4F >> 6 * 4G RECC RAM >> 22 * WD RE3 1T harddisk >> 4 * intel 320 (160G) SSD >> 1 * supermicro 846E1-900B chassis >> >> I just want to say, this isn't supported hardware, and >> although many people will say they do this without problem, >> I've heard just as many people (including myself) saying it's >> unstable that way. >> >> >> I've never had issues with Supermicro boards. I'm using a similar >> model and everything on the board is supported. >> >> I recommend buying either the oracle hardware or the nexenta >> on whatever they recommend for hardware. >> >> Definitely DO NOT run the free version of solaris without >> updates and expect it to be reliable. >> >> >> That's a bit strong. Yes I do regularly update my supported >> (Oracle) systems, but I've never had problems with my own build >> Solaris Express systems. >> >> I waste far more time on (now luckily legacy) fully supported >> Solaris 10 boxes! >> >> >> what does it mean? >> > > Solaris 10 live upgrade is a pain in the arse! It gets confused when you > have lots of filesystems, clones and zones. > > > I am going to install solaris 10 u10 on this server.it <http://server.it> >> that any problem about compatible? >> >> and which version of solaris or solaris derived do you suggest to build >> storage with the above hardware. >> > > I'm running 11 Express now, upgrading to Solaris 11 this weekend. Unless > you have good reason to use Solaris 10, use Solaris 11 or OpenIndiana. >
I was once consider Openindiana, but it's still on development stage, I don't know if this version(oi_151a) is stable enough for production usage -- > Ian. > > ______________________________**_________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/**mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss<http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss> >
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
