On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Jim Klimov <jimkli...@cos.ru> wrote: > 2011-10-13 13:27, Darren J Moffat пишет: >> >> On 10/13/11 09:27, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Darren J Moffat >>> <darr...@opensolaris.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Have you looked at the time-slider functionality that is already in >>>> Solaris >>>> ? >>> >>> Hi Darren. Is it available for Solaris 10? I just installed Solaris 10 >>> u10 and couldn't find it. >> >> No it is not. >>> >>> Is there a reference on how to get/install this functionality on Solaris >>> 10? >> >> No because it doesn't exist on Solaris 10. >> > > Well, just for the sake of completeness: most of our systems are using > zfs-auto-snap service, including Solaris 10 systems datiing from Sol10u6. > Installation of relevant packages from SXCE (ranging snv_117-snv_130) > was trivial, but some script-patching was in order. I think, replacement > of the ksh interpreter to ksh93.
Yes, I remembered reading about that. > > I haven't used the GUI part and I guess my experience relates to the > script-based zfs-auto-snap (before it was remade into current binary > form, or so I read). We kind of got stuck with SXCE systems which > still "just work" finely ;) > > The point is, even if unsupported (may be a problem in OP's case) > it is likely that one or another version of zfs-auto-snap or TimeSlider > can be made to work in Sol10 with little effort. To be honest, if it's just to get it work, I'd just make my own. Or running SE with a solaris 10 zone inside it, with SE managing time-slider/replication and S10 zone running the application. But for this particular case support is essential. That's why I mentioned earlier if I can't get a supported solution for this setup (with a reasonable price), storage-based replication would have to do. -- Fajar _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
