Hi Thomas,

Thanks for that link. That's very similar but not identical. There's a 
different line number in zfs_ioctl.c, mine and Preston's fail on line 1815. It 
could be because of a difference in levels in that module of course, but the 
traceback is not identical either. Ours show brand_sysenter and the one you 
linked to shows brand_sys_syscall. I don't know what all that means but it is 
different. Anyway at least two of us have identical failures.

I was not using crypto, just a plain jane mirror on 2 drives. Possibly I had 
compression on a few file systems but everything else was allowed to default.

Here are our screenshots in case anybody doesn't want to go through the thread.


http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/13/zfsimportfail.jpg/

http://prestonconnors.com/zvol_get_stats.jpg


I hope somebody can help with this. It's not a good feeling having so much data 
gone.

Thanks for your help. Oracle, are you listening?

Jim



----- Original Message -----
> From: Thomas Gouverneur <t...@ians.be>
> To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Cc: Stu Whitefish <swhitef...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 1:57:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Kernel panic on zpool import. 200G of data 
> inaccessible!
> 
> You're probably hitting bug 7056738 -> 
> http://wesunsolve.net/bugid/id/7056738
> Looks like it's not fixed yet @ oracle anyway...
> 
> Were you using crypto on your datasets ?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Thomas
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to