On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:17:38PM -0700, Cooper Hubbell wrote: > Which 320 series drive are you targeting, specifically? The ~$100 > 80GB variant should perform as well as the more expensive versions if > your workload is more random from what I've seen/read.
ESX NFS-attached datastore activity. Probably up to 100 VM's (about the same as we did with the X-25E). Larger drives would let us set overcommit pretty high :) For ZIL, I suppose we could get the 300GB drive and overcommit to 95%! Ray _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
