also, snapshot destroys are much slower with older releases such as 134.  i 
recommend an upgrade.  but an upgrade will not help much if you are using dedup.

  -- Garrett D'Amore

On Aug 10, 2011, at 8:32 PM, Edward Ned Harvey 
<opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com> wrote:

>> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
>> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ian Collins
>> 
>>> I am facing issue with zfs destroy, this takes almost 3 Hours to
>> delete the snapshot of size 150G.
>>> 
>> Do you have dedup enabled?
> 
> I have always found, zfs destroy takes some time.  zpool destroy takes no
> time.
> 
> Although zfs destroy takes some time, it's not terrible unless you have
> dedup enabled.  If you have dedup enabled, then yes it's terrible, as Ian
> suggested.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to