On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Nico Williams wrote:
Seems to me that it'd be nicer to have an interface to raw flash (no wear leveling, direct access to erasure, read, write, read-modify-write [as an optimization]). Then the filesystem could do a much better job of using flash efficiently. But a raw interface wouldn't be a disk-compatible interface.
Do you mean like as is already done by Linux UBI and ubifs? http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubi.html http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html This sort of thing is already done in embedded devices. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
