I'll be doing this over the upcoming weekend so I'll see how it goes.

Thanks for all of the suggestions. 

Todd



On Jun 22, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Cindy Swearingen <cindy.swearin...@oracle.com> 
wrote:

> Hi Todd,
> 
> Yes, I have seen zpool scrub do some miracles but I think it depends
> on the amount of corruption.
> 
> A few suggestions are:
> 
> 1. Identify and resolve the corruption problems on the underlying
> hardware. No point in trying to clear the pool errors if this
> problem continues.
> 
> The fmdump command and the fmdump -eV command output will
> tell you how long these errors have occurred.
> 
> 2. Run zpool scrub and zpool clear to attempt to clear the errors.
> 
> 3. If the errors below don't clear, then manually remove the corrupted
> files below, if possible, and restore from backup. Depending on what
> fmdump says, you might check your backups for corruption.
> 
> 4. Run zpool scrub and zpool clear again as needed.
> 
> 5. Consider replacing this configuration with a redundant ZFS storage
> pool. We can provide the recommended syntax.
> 
> Let us know how this turns out.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Cindy
> 
> On 06/20/11 23:36, Todd Urie wrote:
>> I have a zpool that shows the following from a zpool status -v <zpool name>
>> brsnnfs0104 [/var/spool/cron/scripts]# zpool status -v ABC0101
>>  pool:ABC0101
>> state: ONLINE
>> status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
>>        corruption.  Applications may be affected.
>> action: Restore the file in question if possible.  Otherwise restore the
>>        entire pool from backup.
>>   see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-8A
>> scrub: none requested
>> config:
>>        NAME                              STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
>>        ABC0101                           ONLINE       0     0    10
>>          /dev/vx/dsk/ABC01dg/ABC0101_01  ONLINE       0     0     2
>>          /dev/vx/dsk/ABC01dg/ABC0101_02  ONLINE       0     0     8
>>          /dev/vx/dsk/ABC01dg/ABC0101_03  ONLINE       0     0    10
>> errors: Permanent errors have been detected in the following files:
>>        
>> /clients/ABC0101/rep/local/bfm/web/htdocs/tmp/rscache/717b52282ea059452621587173561360
>>        
>> /clients/ABC0101/rep/local/bfm/web/htdocs/tmp/rscache/6e6a9f37c4d13fdb3dcb8649272a2a49
>>        
>> /clients/ABC0101/rep/d0/prod1/reports/ReutersCMOLoad/ReutersCMOLoad.ABCntss001.20110620.141330.26496.ROLLBACK_FOR_UPDATE_COUPONS.html
>>        
>> /clients/ABC0101/rep/local/bfm/web/htdocs/tmp/G2_0.related_detail_loader.1308593666.54643.n5cpoli3355.data
>>        
>> /clients/ABC0101/rep/d0/prod1/reports/gp_reports/ALLMNG/20110429/F_OLPO82_A.gp.ABCIM_GA.nlaf.xml.gz
>>        
>> /clients/ABC0101/rep/d0/prod1/reports/gp_reports/ALLMNG/20110429/UNVLXCIAFI.gp.ABCIM_GA.nlaf.xml.gz
>>        
>> /clients/ABC0101/rep/d0/prod1/reports/gp_reports/ALLMNG/20110429/UNIVLEXCIA.gp.BARCRATING_ABC.nlaf.xml.gz
>> I think that a scrub at least has the possibility to clear this up.  A quick 
>> search suggests that others have had some good experience with using scrub 
>> in similar circumstances.  I was wondering if anyone could share some of 
>> their experiences, good and bad, so that I can assess the risk and 
>> probability of success with this approach.  Also, any other ideas would 
>> certainly be appreciated.
>> -----RTU
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> zfs-discuss mailing list
>> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to