On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:01:15AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: > Hello przemolicc, > > Thursday, June 29, 2006, 8:01:26 AM, you wrote: > > ppf> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:30:28PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: > >> ppf> What I wanted to point out is the Al's example: he wrote about > >> damaged data. Data > >> ppf> were damaged by firmware _not_ disk surface ! In such case ZFS > >> doesn't help. ZFS can > >> ppf> detect (and repair) errors on disk surface, bad cables, etc. But > >> cannot detect and repair > >> ppf> errors in its (ZFS) code. > >> > >> Not in its code but definitely in a firmware code in a controller. > > ppf> As Jeff pointed out: if you mirror two different storage arrays. > > Not only I belive. There are some classes of problems that even in one > array ZFS could help for fw problems (with many controllers in > active-active config like Symetrix).
Any real example ? przemol _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
