On Feb 27, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: >> I can live with that-- but I really want to know what (real, not virtual) >> controllers disks are connected to; I want to build 3 8-disk RAIDz2 vdevs >> now (with room for a fourth for expansion later) and I really want to make >> sure each of those vdevs has fewer than three disks per controller so >> a single controller failure can degrade my vdevs but not kill them. > > I cannot but agree. On Linux and Windoze (haven't tested FreeBSD), drives > connected to an LSI9211 show up in the correct order, but not on > OI/osol/S11ex (IIRC), and fmtopo doesn't always show a mapping between device > name and slot, since that relies on the SES hardware being properly > supported. The answer I've got for this issue is, it's not an issue, since > it's that way by design etc. This doesn't make sense when Linux/Windows show > the drives in the correct order. IMHO this looks more like a design flaw in > the driver code
lsiutil can help. The question is whether the physical labels or silkscreen match the "slot" as reported by lsiutil. -- richard _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
