On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Eric D. Mudama
<edmud...@bounceswoosh.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23 at 13:29, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
>>
>> Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps a bit off-topic (I asked on the rescue list --
>>> http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/OaDWVGdLhxWVWIEabz4F -- and was told
>>> to try here), but I am kinda shooting in the dark: I have been finding
>>> online scattered and vague info stating that this card can be made to work
>>> with a sparc solaris 10 box
>>> (http://old.nabble.com/eSATA-or-firewire-in-Solaris-Sparc-system-td27150246.html
>>> is the only link I can offer right now). Can anyone confirm or deny that?
>>
>> 3112/3114 was a very early (possibly the first?) SATA chipset, I think
>> aimed for use before SATA drivers had been developed. I would suggest
>> looking for something more modern.
>
> Not only that, the 3112 would do non-sector-aligned FIS transfers for
> writes > 15 sectors, which caused all sorts of trouble for the
> firmware developers at the disk companies, resulting in numerous
> reports of compatibility and performance problems with 3112/3114
> hardware.
>
> I +1 the suggestion to find something more modern if at all possible.
>
     Oh, just lovely. What would you suggest instead? I mean, besides
canning the machine altogether ;)

> --eric
>
> --
> Eric D. Mudama
> edmud...@bounceswoosh.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to