On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Richard Elling <richard.ell...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a failure going on here. It could be a cable or it could be a bad > disk or firmware. The actual fault might not be in the disk reporting the > errors (!) > It is not a media error. >
Errors were as follows: Feb 01 19:33:01.3665 ereport.io.scsi.cmd.disk.recovered 0x269213b01d700401 Feb 01 19:33:01.3665 ereport.io.scsi.cmd.disk.recovered 0x269213b01d700401 Feb 01 19:33:01.3665 ereport.io.scsi.cmd.disk.recovered 0x269213b01d700401 Feb 01 19:33:04.9969 ereport.io.scsi.cmd.disk.tran 0x269f99ef0b300401 Feb 01 19:33:04.9970 ereport.io.scsi.cmd.disk.tran 0x269f9a165a400401 Verbose of a message: Feb 01 2011 19:33:04.996932283 ereport.io.scsi.cmd.disk.tran nvlist version: 0 class = ereport.io.scsi.cmd.disk.tran ena = 0x269f99ef0b300401 detector = (embedded nvlist) nvlist version: 0 version = 0x0 scheme = dev device-path = /pci@0,0/pci8086,2e21@1/pci15d9,a580@0/sd@3,0 (end detector) devid = id1,sd@n5000c50010ed6a31 driver-assessment = fail op-code = 0x0 cdb = 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 pkt-reason = 0x18 pkt-state = 0x1 pkt-stats = 0x0 __ttl = 0x1 __tod = 0x4d48a640 0x3b6bfabb It was a cable error, but why didn't fault management tell me about it? What do you mean by "The actual fault might not be in the disk reporting the errors (!) It is not a media error."? Fault might be sourcing from my SATA controller or something possibly? _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss