On Jan 30, 2011, at 4:31 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:

> On 1/30/2011 12:39 AM, Richard Elling wrote:
>>> Hmmm, doesnt look good on any of the drives.
>> 
>> I'm not sure of the way BSD enumerates devices.  Some clever person thought
>> that hiding the partition or slice would be useful. I don't find it useful.  
>> On a Solaris
>> system, ZFS can show a disk something like c0t1d0, but that doesn't exist. 
>> The
>> actual data is in slice 0, so you need to use c0t1d0s0 as the argument to 
>> zdb.
> 
> I think its the right syntax.  On the older drives,

Bummer. You've got to fix this before you can import the pool.
No labels, no import.
 -- richard

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to