On Jan 30, 2011, at 4:31 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 1/30/2011 12:39 AM, Richard Elling wrote: >>> Hmmm, doesnt look good on any of the drives. >> >> I'm not sure of the way BSD enumerates devices. Some clever person thought >> that hiding the partition or slice would be useful. I don't find it useful. >> On a Solaris >> system, ZFS can show a disk something like c0t1d0, but that doesn't exist. >> The >> actual data is in slice 0, so you need to use c0t1d0s0 as the argument to >> zdb. > > I think its the right syntax. On the older drives,
Bummer. You've got to fix this before you can import the pool. No labels, no import. -- richard _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss