> -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Lahm [mailto:frankl...@googlemail.com] > Sent: 25 January 2011 14:50 > To: Ryan John > Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Changed ACL behavior in snv_151 ?
> John, > welcome onboard! > 2011/1/25 Ryan John <john.r...@bsse.ethz.ch>: >> I’m sharing file systems using a smb and nfs, and since I’ve upgraded to >> snv_151, when I do a chmod from an NFS client, I lose all the NFSv4 ACLs. > <http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=134162> > I'd summarize as follows: > in order to play nice with Windows ACL semantics via builtin CIFS, > they choose the approach of throwing away ACLs on chmod(). Makes > Windows happy, others not so. > -f Hi Frank, This really breaks our whole setup. Under snv_134 our users were happy with Windows ACLs, and NFSv3 and NFSv4 Linux clients. They all worked very well together. The only problem we had with the deny ACLs, was when using the MacOS "Finder" I don't think there's a way we can tell our users not to do a chmod. Was it a result of PSARC/2009/029 ? http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/029/20100126_mark.shellenbaum If so, I think that was implemented around snv_137. This would also mean it's the same in Illumos. Regards John _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
