[I'm deleting the whole thread, since this is a rehash of several discussions on this list previously - check out the archives, and search for "ECC RAM"]

These days, for a "home" server, you really have only one choice to make:

"How much power do I care that this thing uses?"



If you are sensitive to the power (and possibly cooling) budget that your home server might use, then there are a myriad of compromises you're going to have to make - and lack of ECC support is almost certainly going to be the first one. Very, very, very few low-power (i.e. under 25W) CPUs support ECC. A couple of the very-low-voltage EE Opterons, and some of the laptop-series Core2 chips are about the best hope you have get a CPU which is both low-power and supports ECC.


If you don't really care about ultra-low-power, then there's absolutely no excuse not to buy a USED server-class machine which is 1- or 2- generations back. They're dirt cheap, readily available, and support all those nice features you'll have problems replicating in trying to do a build-it-yourself current-gen box.


For instance, an IBM x3500 tower machine, with dual-core Xeon 5100-series CPUs, on-board ILOM/BMC, redundant power supply, ECC RAM support, and 8 hot-swap SAS/SATA 3.5" bays (and the nice SAS/SATA controller supported by Solaris) is about $500, minus the drives. The Sun Ultra 40 is similar. The ultra-cheapo Dell 400SC works fine, too.


And, frankly, buying a used brand-name server machine will almost certainly give you a big advantage over building-it-yourself in one crucial (and generally overlooked) area: the power supply. These machines have significantly better power supplies (and, most have redundant ones) than what you can buy for a PC. Indeed, figure you need to spend at least $100 on the PS alone if you build it yourself.


--
Erik Trimble
Java System Support
Mailstop:  usca22-123
Phone:  x17195
Santa Clara, CA

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to