But all of which have newer code, today, than onnv-134. On 18 September 2010 22:20, Tom Bird <t...@marmot.org.uk> wrote:
> On 18/09/10 13:06, Edho P Arief wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Tom Bird<t...@marmot.org.uk> wrote: >> >>> All said and done though, we will have to live with snv_134's bugs from >>> now >>> on, or perhaps I could try Sol 10. >>> >> >> or OpenIllumos. Or Nexenta. Or FreeBSD. Or<insert osol distro name>. >> > > ... none of which will receive ZFS code updates unless Oracle deigns to > bestow them upon the community, this or ZFS dev is taken over by said > community, in which case we end up with diverging code bases that would be a > sisyphean task to try and merge. > > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
