Not sure what the best list to send this to is right now, so I have selected a few, apologies in advance.
A couple questions. First I have a physical host (call him bob) that was just installed with b134 a few days ago. I upgraded to b145 using the instructions on the Illumos wiki yesterday. The pool has been upgraded (27) and the zfs file systems have been upgraded (5). ch...@bob:~# zpool upgrade rpool This system is currently running ZFS pool version 27. Pool 'rpool' is already formatted using the current version. ch...@bob:~# zfs upgrade rpool 7 file systems upgraded The file systems have been upgraded according to "zfs get version rpool" Looks ok to me. However, I now get an error when I run zdb -D. I can't remember exactly when I turned dedup on, but I moved some data on rpool, and "zpool list" shows 1.74x ratio. ch...@bob:~# zdb -D rpool zdb: can't open 'rpool': No such file or directory Also, running zdb by itself, returns expected output, but still says my rpool is version 22. Is that expected? I never ran zdb before the upgrade, since it was a clean install from the b134 iso to go straight to b145. One thing I will mention is that the hostname of the machine was changed too (using these instructions<http://wiki.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/Change_hostname_HOWTO>). bob used to be eric. I don't know if that matters, but I can't open up the "Users and Groups" from Gnome anymore, *"unable to su"* so something is still not right there. Moving on, I have another fresh install of b134 from iso inside a virtualbox virtual machine, on a total different physical machine. This machine is named weston and was upgraded to b145 using the same Illumos wiki instructions. His name has never changed. When I run the same zdb -D command I get the expected output. ch...@weston:~# zdb -D rpool DDT-sha256-zap-unique: 11 entries, size 558 on disk, 744 in core dedup = 1.00, compress = 7.51, copies = 1.00, dedup * compress / copies = 7.51 However, after zpool and zfs upgrades *on both machines*, they still say the rpool is version 22. Is that expected/correct? I added a new virtual disk to the vm weston to see what would happen if I made a new pool on the new disk. ch...@weston:~# zpool create test c5t1d0 Well, the new "test" pool shows version 27, but rpool is still listed at 22 by zdb. Is this expected /correct behavior? See the output below to see the rpool and test pool version numbers according to zdb on the host weston. Can anyone provide any insight into what I'm seeing? Do I need to delete my b134 boot environments for rpool to show as version 27 in zdb? Why does zdb -D rpool give me can't open on the host bob? Thank you in advance, -Chris ch...@weston:~# zdb rpool: version: 22 name: 'rpool' state: 0 txg: 7254 pool_guid: 17616386148370290153 hostid: 8413798 hostname: 'weston' vdev_children: 1 vdev_tree: type: 'root' id: 0 guid: 17616386148370290153 create_txg: 4 children[0]: type: 'disk' id: 0 guid: 14826633751084073618 path: '/dev/dsk/c5t0d0s0' devid: 'id1,s...@sata_____vbox_harddisk____vbf6ff53d9-49330fdb/a' phys_path: '/p...@0,0/pci8086,2...@d/d...@0,0:a' whole_disk: 0 metaslab_array: 23 metaslab_shift: 28 ashift: 9 asize: 32172408832 is_log: 0 create_txg: 4 test: version: 27 name: 'test' state: 0 txg: 26 pool_guid: 13455895622924169480 hostid: 8413798 hostname: 'weston' vdev_children: 1 vdev_tree: type: 'root' id: 0 guid: 13455895622924169480 create_txg: 4 children[0]: type: 'disk' id: 0 guid: 7436238939623596891 path: '/dev/dsk/c5t1d0s0' devid: 'id1,s...@sata_____vbox_harddisk____vba371da65-169e72ea/a' phys_path: '/p...@0,0/pci8086,2...@d/d...@1,0:a' whole_disk: 1 metaslab_array: 30 metaslab_shift: 24 ashift: 9 asize: 3207856128 is_log: 0 create_txg: 4
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
