> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Peter Taps
> 
> As you may have heard, NetApp has a lawsuit against Sun in 2007 (and
> now carried over to Oracle) for patent infringement with the zfs file
> 
> Given this, I am wondering what you think is the future of zfs as an
> open source project.

Others have already stated "Oracle won the case" in better detail than I
could.  So ZFS is safe in solaris/opensolaris.  But some other big names
(Apple) have backed down from deploying ZFS, presumably due to threats, and
some others (coraid) are being sued anyway.  This does reduce the number of
ZFS deployments in the world, so it's probably benefitting Netapp to keep
the suit alive, even if they never collect a dollar.  

But surprisingly, I think it's also benefitting Oracle.  The lack of ZFS
competition certainly helps Oracle sell sun hardware and solaris support
contracts.  As strongly as I feel "apple enterprise" is an oxymoron, and
apple servers contribute negative value to an infrastructure, I do know a
lot of people who buy / have bought them.  And I think that number would be
higher, if Apple were shipping ZFS.

So, IMHO:  COW lawsuit:  Good for NetApp.  Good for Oracle and solaris.  Bad
for ZFS like a rainy day is bad for baseball.  And bad for everybody else.  

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to