Peter Jeremy <peter.jer...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

> On 2010-Jun-11 17:41:38 +0800, Joerg Schilling 
> <joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >PP.S.: Did you know that FreeBSD _includes_ the GPLd Reiserfs in the FreeBSD 
> >kernel since a while and that nobody did complain about this, see e.g.:
> >
> >http://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/sys/gnu/fs/reiserfs/
>
> That is completely irrelevant and somewhat misleading.  FreeBSD has
> never prohibited non-BSD-licensed code in their kernel or userland
> however it has always been optional and, AFAIR, the GENERIC kernel has
> always defaulted to only contain BSD code.  Non-BSD code (whether GPL
> or CDDL) is carefully segregated (note the 'gnu' in the above URI).

Sorry but your reply is completely misleading as the people who claim that 
there is a legal problem with having ZFS in the Linux kernel would of course 
also claim that Reiserfs cannot be in the FreeBSD kernel.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       j...@cs.tu-berlin.de                (uni)  
       joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to