On 06/ 1/10 07:16 AM, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
Here is zpool status for my 'data' pool:
r...@opensolaris: 11:43 AM :~# zpool status data
pool: data
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
data ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C500028BD5FCd0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C50009A4D727d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C50009A46AF5d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C50009A515B0d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C500028A81BEd0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C500028B44A1d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C500028B415Bd0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C500028B23D2d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C5000CC3338Dd0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C500027F59C8d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C50009DBF8D4d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C500027F3C1Fd0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C5000DAF02F3d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C5000DA7ED4Ed0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C5000DAEF990d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C5000DAEEF8Ed0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C5000DAEB881d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C5000A121581d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C5000DAC848Fd0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5000C50002770EE6d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0
Yes, all the disks are the same size (1000.2 TB)
Is that the pool you are writing to in your other thread?
If so, it's no surprise you are getting poor write performance with a
raidz2 that wide!
--
Ian.
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
