On Thu, May 20, 2010 14:12, Travis Tabbal wrote: >> On May 19, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Don wrote: > >> The data risk is a few moments of data loss. However, >> if the order of the >> uberblock updates is not preserved (which is why the >> caches are flushed) >> then recovery from a reboot may require manual >> intervention. The amount >> of manual intervention could be significant for >> builds prior to b128. > > > This risk is mostly mitigated by UPS backup and auto-shutdown when the UPS > detects power loss, correct?
Unless you have a contractor working in the server room that bumps into the UPS and causes a power glitch which causes a whole bunch of equipment to cycle. Happened at $WORK (in another office) just two weeks ago. It all depends on your level of paranoia. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
