> it looks like your 'sd5' disk is performing horribly
> bad and except
> for the horrible performance of 'sd5' (which
> bottlenecks the I/O),
> 'sd4' would look just as bad. Regardless, the first
> step would be to
> investigate 'sd5'.
Hi Bob !
I've already tried the pool without the sd5 disk (so pool in degraded mode),
but the performances was still the same... So the sd5 disk itself is not the
(only) bottleneck...
> Use 'iostat -xen' to obtain more information,
> including the number of
> reported errors.
iostat -xen
extended device statistics ---- errors ---
r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b s/w h/w trn tot
device
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 9 0 9
c8t0d0
0.3 0.4 14.1 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.9 0 0 0 0 0 0
c7t0d0
65.5 6.6 1234.3 97.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 14.5 0 14 0 0 0 0
c7t2d0
70.6 6.1 1229.2 97.6 0.0 1.3 0.0 16.3 0 16 0 0 0 0
c7t3d0
94.0 6.7 2349.2 97.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 36.1 0 23 0 0 0 0
c7t4d0
80.4 12.1 2306.5 91.3 0.0 16.6 0.0 179.7 0 68 0 0 0 0
c7t5d0
Thanks !
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
