On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 09:40:15AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > Thus, you'll get good throughput for resilver on these drives pretty > > much in just ONE case: large files with NO deletions. If you're using > > them for write-once/read-many/no-delete archives, then you're OK. > > Anything else is going to suck.
thanks for pointing out the obvious. :) Still, though, this is basically true for ANY drive. It's worse for slower RPM drives, but it's not like resilvers will exactly be fast with 7200rpm drives, either. danno -- Dan Pritts, Sr. Systems Engineer Internet2 office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224 Visit our website: www.internet2.edu Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/internet2 Become a Fan on Facebook: www.internet2.edu/facebook _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
